UNCERTAINTY
April 10, 2009
There are times that bring on feelings of uncertainty or helplessness, they may arrive at four in the morning or as I walk down Michigan Avenue on a beautiful spring day. There are times when I look to what I have depended on and trusted, only to find that they are not enough or have disappeared. These are the times when I am sure there are no alternatives left in my cupboard.
When this happens I have found out that there is a reason:That somehow or other I have put myself in the center of my universe, this weak bearing. If I then imagine that I am not the center, and even though I can’t put into words or images what is I do know, I am certain of its Presence and know instinctively that it doesn’t disappear or disappoint. And when I do manage to get my head around that idea I find that I am in a better place, a place where I ought to be.
This is not a piece of any religion or cult, just something I discovered that fits right, and so I thought I’d pass it along.
Begining the universe with a word
March 28, 2009
William James once asked Helen Keller to describe what life was like prior to learning her first word, her response was that there was nothing, no description, nothing to re member, a gray miasma; it was when t that first word, water, became real that ideas became real,that Helen Keller became a human being. Her universe was created.
It is reported that as a species we have been around for about 180,000 years, a number that becomes more accurate as scientists examine new evidence using new techniques; but examples of what we are as human beings goes only to cave paintings, the oldest writings are but a few thousand, does no one want to talk about that gap? What about the first 150,000 or so years? The animal that is us existed, ate, fornicated, shat and begat for a long, long time, but apparently without language.
From the mists of our past a truth came through far enough to be put down in what was to become part of the bible, something to the effect that-the word was the beginning. It was not until the first of our ancestors put her hand on something and uttered ‘rock’ that rock was created, and then she gave her partner that look, look was all she had to give him as she had no other word, gave him that look that says ‘pay attention to me the one with the vagina, this is important what I have just done, she repeated the sound until he understood, until he slapped an object and made the sound ‘rock’, I can only imagine the joy them both as they created a world ‘rock’, and then he slapped another object, what we now call ‘tree’, he repeated ‘rock’, she gave him that look again, he eventually came to see that the world was ‘rock’ and not-’rock’. In the beginning was the word.
A baby sees that the object incessantly put in front of its face, and the sound ‘ball’, are the same thing, object is ball, ball is object, there is now a world and it is ‘ball’. There isn’t one of us who hasn’t enjoyed watching an infant with the first word, the world is ‘ball’, the word is repeated ad nauseum; remember the look on the infant’s face, pure joy, the first joy of a human being. That child has become a being with a universe, has the joy of creation.
Periodically the New York Times reports or copies the bleatings of physical scientists and the bible-beaters as they throw their paper weapons at one another in exasperation, frustration arising from the intuitive knowledge that neither one has anything worth while to say.
Newton, and then Einstein, stated clearly, without evasion that this is what we have, there can’t be more and there can’t be less; Einstein made it even more inclusive by adding energy to matter, making the point even stronger. This is what there is, there can’t be more and there can’t be less.
So what the hell is a physical scientist doing talking about creating the world, that ain’t his game, he has all that there is, the scientists job is to explain it.
So what the hell is the bible-beater doing talking about the physical world, that ain’t her game, she has all that she needs, if she would just examine herself within.
It is that that arises from being, from knowing, from learning that the spiritual world is about; examine what happens the first time you fall in love, that surprising event that defines fifth grade, that took over my life bringing great adventure and sorrow, examine what that is about, that is the world of creation and the spirit, perhaps even the Spirit.
The One True Way
March 15, 2009
Last night I was discussing with a friend the nature of the religious experience (perhaps this explains why I spend so much time alone); and the only way to maintain or repeat the experience. It will be no surprise that mine is the only right way to do this is by going the route that I do, that every other direction is misguided and leads to dead ends.
That someone else would have the temerity to claim that connecting with others, to do something in concert was a road to enlightenment or even epiphany seems so contrary. My ascetic struggles obviously are what has brought me to this stage of development. The argument was going absolutely nowhere nor could it; if each of us finds ourself in a new place, with new perspective that is so life changing and defining it seems impossible that someone else could have done this differently.
I now have first hand knowledge of why there are religious differences; that there will always be differences; why they are so violent in defending the true way.
That Abject Feeling
March 4, 2009
There are times in everyone’s life when the terror of aloneness approaches the limits of what can be handled, if the loneliness was any more painful it would push me over the edge. When I see that boundary coming at me I automatically look for diversions, we look for diversions because allowing or welcoming pain is weird or pathological. They might be: work, booze, drugs, orgasms, casual friends, games and entertainment, there is Twitter and Facebook; all these and more allow me to shy from this abject feeling, this most horrible of feelings.
There are times in everyone’s life when the bliss of solitude is the greatest pleasure imaginable; I then travel with the knowledge that I am where I ought to be and who I ought to be. I need nothing; I will have activities but they are no longer necessities. When I have let myself drift from being the center of my universe and that necessity to control I get to enjoy this rightness.
To find the latter I have to allow abject loneliness its time on stage, letting it cavort and destroy the sets, frightening us actors. It is when I stay for that complete show, all three acts, watch the curtain descend that I can allow myself to be–to leave the theatre in peace.
Forcing myself to feel the pain of loneliness and emptiness is not masochism because there is no pleasure in it; but from the depths of that terror arise bliss, joy, rightness and a knowledge of that that allows all this to be.
On seeing her photo
February 22, 2009
I recently came across a web picture of someone whom I had loved unconditionally but haven’t seen in many years. The photo caused a pang of remembrance of that old feeling, even though our mutual rejections were right and necessary conclusions.
Neither of us could have lived on as we had become, we had mutually created a monstrous situation. That picture was not of what came at the end of our scene, it is of the person whom I had loved and realize I still do. Is it possible to have had a religious experience, to know what it is like to transcend this mundane situation—-and then to not know it? No; it may be that I don’t always find myself in that holy place, but I don’t or can’t deny it nor would I try. So can I deny or should I try to reject someone whom I loved greatly just because of circumstances, would that not be a rejection of the honesty of my search? I cannot deny the great pain her rejection caused me, and am sure that I brought her unhappiness in turn.
And yet I cannot understand or accept the concept of rejection, it just doesn’t compute. As I write out my reaction to her picture I wonder what it means if anything. Is this just the nature of going along, that somehow feeling that loss again, that love once more means nothing other than the piercing of strong emotion?
Goals and answers
May 29, 2008
Yesterday was my fifth and last session at the Chronic Pain Clinic; everyone I met with asked the same question–if I had met my goals for the program? To each one I answered the same: I had no goals, I could have no goals because I was ignorant of what the program had to offer, what my body could accomplish, I can’t foresee the future. This didn’t sit easily with any of the therapists, as I well knew from previous discussions; they have forms to complete, statistics to be calculated, and they are trained to having goals in what they do. What I answered each of them was whether I was happy with what had happened at the Clinic, was I discontented over any part of the program?
I am pleased with every part of the program: with the attention and focus of the physicians, the alternate medication they offered; with the attitude and professional nature of the nurses; with the insights and understanding of the psychologists; with the advice and attention of the O. T. staff; with the exercises and rehabilitation offered by P. T.; with the increased management offered by the bio-feedback portion. All areas offered benefits that I attempted to absorb to the fullest. But I had no goals, I had only attitude, to get all that I could out of what this clinic was offering, to do whatever I could to minimize my pain and discomfort, to be open to whatever benefit might come along.
This is of course an attitude towards the spiritual or Spiritual life; I can’t say that I am in full communion with the Divine, who could know that? I cannot say what my Spiritual quest will give me, if I could then it wouldn’t be a quest for what is unknown to me now. This is an attitude that often results in anxiety of the unknown, it would be comfortable to know that if I prayed a certain number of times, if I did so many good works, if I followed a particular method I would gain enlightenment. That’d be a great thing if it was so, but it is not, it has never been the path to enlightenment, never will be; it may be the reason that the organized church is on the edge of irrelevancy, except for the lack of alternative. To be catholic is to be a good follower, it has never been anything else.
I received far more from the Pain Management Program than I could have predicted, and I am pleased that I did not have quantitative or qualitative goals that may have given me temporary pleasure but would have restricted my growth. The same can be said of my spiritual journey; I don’t know where it will lead, I have faith that good will result, but I have no knowledge of the future or of the infinity of the Spiritual. And that’s the way I have always been.
And that would be a difference between being a conservative and what I am.