On seeing her photo
February 22, 2009
I recently came across a web picture of someone whom I had loved unconditionally but haven’t seen in many years. The photo caused a pang of remembrance of that old feeling, even though our mutual rejections were right and necessary conclusions.
Neither of us could have lived on as we had become, we had mutually created a monstrous situation. That picture was not of what came at the end of our scene, it is of the person whom I had loved and realize I still do. Is it possible to have had a religious experience, to know what it is like to transcend this mundane situation—-and then to not know it? No; it may be that I don’t always find myself in that holy place, but I don’t or can’t deny it nor would I try. So can I deny or should I try to reject someone whom I loved greatly just because of circumstances, would that not be a rejection of the honesty of my search? I cannot deny the great pain her rejection caused me, and am sure that I brought her unhappiness in turn.
And yet I cannot understand or accept the concept of rejection, it just doesn’t compute. As I write out my reaction to her picture I wonder what it means if anything. Is this just the nature of going along, that somehow feeling that loss again, that love once more means nothing other than the piercing of strong emotion?
Use Another Label
March 4, 2008
I was reading the review of Nothing To Be Frightened Of by Julian Barnes in the Times Literary Supplement, there is this quote from him and an addition by the reviewer John Carey: ‘ “I don’t believe in God, but I miss him,” he admits — a perfect summary of the modern western predicament.’
That line stuck in my head, a day later I am putting down here my reaction to it. The intuitive need for a Spiritual life is the clue to follow, get to know what it is that summons, that offers more than is obvious. Become intimately acquainted with what you already know, have always known; be your own guide and tourist; for the time being stop using labels and rules, look to where intuition has always been willing to guide.
Never forget that the church is an institution, set up as an organization by a bunch of guys who wanted to please an emperor, have a creed that all would obey; they chose writings that would be allowed in the book, and those that would be forbidden, wrote that promise of obedience–the creed. I have no idea what the intentions were in these men, I do know about the emperor, the meeting on the island, orthodoxy; all may have been done for noble reasons, but no other person can know the divine better than any other, that is the essence of being acceptable, it has been the power of the example for two thousand years, it is in the nature of being.
The symbols, the rituals, the liturgy will return and be even more important, but only after one knows the nature of the divine, one has looked inside and found the truth. All the other stuff is nice, and it fits; it is supplementary, it does not lead one to understand the ‘ultimate concern’.
By whatever name one uses the absence of it does leave a void, the important missing part; the need and the quest to know are the basis of the First Commandment, true then true now.
The word “God” carries so much baggage for me, so much that is not my own that I refrain from using it when I look into my own soul and when I write; a term that often fits for me is “wellspring of being”, it portrays not only the source, but is active and ongoing, has the mystery of the source of the spring. Most often I use no word; attempt to be beyond words; to be beyond emotions, accept them, transcend them; step slowly and carefully into the void, with the courage to go towards the infinite.
A man from Darfur
December 30, 2007
I met a man from Darfur; it was an early evening in August, I was walking in the livery staging area at O’Hare. The lot can hold about 200 livery cars and over 300 taxi cabs, a lively place to be on a pleasant evening. I doing what exercise I do, he the same, we walked and talked together for a while, I never saw him again.
The man told me that he had just returned from Darfur, that he had grown up in that area, emigrated to the U. S., had just returned from a visit. He described holding a child as it died, knowing there were other children in the village who were about to die, so many had died in the place he had grown up, so many more would die in the future. There was nothing he could do about it. He was sad, angry, confused, frustrated, and had to come back from that place.
He told me that he was a Muslim, but not a practicing one, that the religion based destruction and killing kept him from the rituals and ceremonies that he had learned growing up. They were responsible for the death of this child, the other child, and all of the others, they who were supposed to be his spiritual guides.
His angry argument against the religious authorities was familiar, I don’t imagine that there is anyone growing up in our culture who has not gone through the argument and history of religion based cruelty, it is something that we start in high school and keep through the early years of college: examples and blame, the frustration of not having a spiritual organization with clean hands. That there is no religious group that has not killed and injured. I don’t need to go through this old harangue, there isn’t anything new about it.
I suggested that he should temporarily lift the words from this business, Allah, Muslim, whatever the nouns are they should be set aside for now. Don’t throw them away, keep them close to hand, within sight and reach. Then go to how he had once felt, what feeling that the practice had given him, just the feeling experience. Stay with just that for a while. He understood what I was offering, agreed that it felt good, was a comfort against his frustration.
All of the words of a Spiritual life carry baggage, so much of it that it is almost impossible to grow from under that weight. Put aside God, Jesus, Christianity, Jehovah, Allah and whatever words, and let whatever it is that is behind those words rise to the surface. There is, always has been, something that needs to be felt, that can’t be ignored, it is the basis for all religions and cults. Just go to that place within, relive the feeling that that you find.
This is nothing more difficult than doing this, nothing takes more courage, and it is the most wonderful. Leave the safe words passed down from your father and mother, the authoritarian laws and directions that were to give lifelong guidance; set them aside, for a short time, be courageous.
The symbols, ceremonies, laws will always be there, they can be picked up and carried at any time—-but for just this short time set them beside me, when I come back to them they will have even more power than previous.
This piece has been the most difficult to complete, has taken nearly a week to get this far. It is far from complete, is disjointed, the words not exact. Writing about this is like engraving smoke. I feel as if I had done too much exercising, I am sore and creaky, and I have a headache; all for those couple of paragraphs. I’ll post this today, will come back to it again, and then once more.
Overcast skies
December 19, 2007
Before I went to bed last night I looked up the N. W. S. forecast, it predicted overcast skies, temperatures a few degrees below then a few degrees above freezing, nothing much else. My reaction was that I was in for a dull, gray day; nothing much going on in my life, Edita is scheduled to come in for a few hours to make me and this place civilized, I’ll clear out ahead of time, no sense interfering with her cleaning; it is time to visit Bert, who might be agitated or not, might recognize me or not; I would check my email to see if hoped for messages came in or they didn’t; I had a new bag of juice oranges- a treat for first thing in the day.
I awoke this morning with that bundle of expectations, my day to be defined and judged by those things, and a dozen more that hadn’t yet come to mind. As I lay awake I realized that that would not be the start or the definition of today; I want a different day. For the last year I have been doing mindfulness exercises that I have found handy, and yet here I was about to define my day with these things that may or may not be pleasant or interesting; it was time to remember the core of what this day will be, what I am.
For many years, throughout my decades of depression I found that being alone, focusing on just being, without sound and movement would make me anxious. It can be anxiety provoking to see and accept that existence is all that there is, everything else as an auxiliary, an accessory. And that out of that notion, that feeling, that place, can could come everything else; I pursued that idea with profit.
I was walking back from the Dominick’s store yesterday, coming up Damen Ave., where I was stopped by a couple of young men from the Church of Latter Day Saints, they were identified by badges pinned to their coats. One fellow asked if they could speak to me for a couple of minutes, I agreed. To his first question, which was whether I knew anything about their church, I suppressed a comment about having spent much of the previous week watching the latest disc release of Big Love, I answered that I knew little. He began to tell me that they believed this, they believed that, they believed the other thing; I won’t try to retell it all, but their beliefs covered just about everything one could list in life, then they asked if I would like to learn more of their church. It was now my turn.
I told them that my relationship with God was in pretty good shape. I said that I really didn’t need to read the narrative of others who had experienced the divine, that no one had ever come to transcendence by reading and memorizing what others had experienced, not one person, ever. That whatever I might need, I already have, its just a matter of looking inside again.
After this pompousness on my part I walked home, self-righteousness striding up Damen Avenue.
But how else could I respond to proselytizing, what to say to someone who intrudes like that?
I have read that there was a time when belief was a word used about notions that were tried and found to be true: Believe in the Pythagorean theorem; believe that the longer the lever I have the greater the force I can apply; believe that when I push against something, I will feel pressure back at me; believe that if I forgot my wife’s birthday I would sleep on the couch; and on and on. The use has changed to be that realm of notions where belief becomes the unbelievable, where one’s innate intelligence is to be switched off, where wishful thinking becomes reality. That Joseph Smith found gold plates from God, inscribed with rules and regulations that were new and exciting? Please, please, please let us bring back critical thinking. I will refrain from going further into the problems that believing has caused us recently. The phrase I respect your beliefs has caused more harm and misdirection that almost any other I know.
And no I am not currently married, no more sleeping on the couch.
The sun has come up brightly from behind the garage across the alley, part of the weather forecast wasn’t correct, not that it matters. I will be in the day, or I will try. I will meet more interesting people on Damen Avenue, or I won’t. I’ll have a semblance of a conversation with Bert in the convalescent home, or I won’t. I will rent a video that is interesting, or one like Once that I am returning today, a study in beige, color, music, story, whining, resembling nothing as much as sipping beige, lukewarm, water.
There are days when I am satisfied with what I put down here, and then there are days when I am not sure.
Writing about the creation
December 9, 2007
For the last few days I have been working on an article about “creation”, I’ll publish it here soon, I hope.
It goes slower than I had thought because there is tension within me: between wanting to show how I have sorted out the idea of creation and the presumption that this is too large and important a subject for a layman to tackle. This isn’t stopping me, but it is making me go through a number of iterations to get it right. And it is a wonderful thing to have going on in the back of ones mind as the other stuff of the day comes along.
There was a program on Charlie Rose the other night about the aging mind, or that was part of the program; if a person would stretch to look at the big ideas that are completely personal the mind would be challenged in a healthy way. No one knows more about the nature of God than I do, or you do, or anyone, it is intrinsically personal. No one knows more about the creation of the universe than I do, or you do, one’s universe is intrinsically personal. Good and bad fall under the same umbrella. It is fun to wake up wondering just how an idea can be put into words that someone else might find interesting.
There is also the benefit that I can write about writing.
More on why Jesus is not God
December 6, 2007
That so many worship Jesus, and yet fail to have a spiritual experience, should lead to realize an important truth:
Jesus is not God, God is God, and Jesus understood this.
That God is ineffable been realized from the beginning, it is the reason that everything written about God must be a metaphor, a way of understanding and passing along that knowledge; whenever a description is taken literally there is trouble, defending the interpretation, aggressively promoting it all end in ignorance and suffering, there are innumerable examples of this, this is a principle reason that so many leave the church.
Even the label ‘God’ is a metaphor.
When Jesus asked why God was not protecting him he came to know this great truth, God is not about the mundane, it was then that Jesus left the worldly and came upon infinite transcendence. He knew intuitively that he must be rejected and killed, he had assistance to have this take place; he had to carry the cross each step himself, had to feel torture and his own murder in order to get to that place:
This is the great truth that may assist us in transcending, to understand the holy.
I don’t see God as a noun, more of a verb, the Wellspring of Being; Tillich’s term the ground of being led me to find my own; I cannot ignore another term of his ultimate concern.
The search for the right term is proper, it is a tool for looking within oneself for the truth, taking that kernel of intuitive knowledge and making it relevant for the self.
Our intuitive and ultimately true task is that search, it has always been so.
Memorizing and repeating the writings of those who have had the spiritual experience doesn’t work, it has never worked, but it is easier than introspection, and so lies the reason so many do it.
Lack of response to ‘Jesus isn’t God’
December 4, 2007
I was surprised that there was no response to a couple of things I wrote about Jesus and God, but then I found that Pages are not published, just Posts. It is taking me a longer time to figure out what WordPress is about than I expected or wished, the time and effort needed to become facile with the features here could be spent on putting the right words down, words that someone might want to read and respond; I know that these quick posts are easy, but I’d like to start some kind of coherent string of things, ideas that have a lifetime longer than a bacillus.
Jesus is not God, the blind belief that he is misses the whole point of the Spiritual Journey, that is to have a personal relationship with God, to explore that wonderful area just beyond the mundane, the known, the easy. Jesus knew all of this, tried to explain it to some others, knew that to be rejected and murdered was necessary for him to know the true Him, and then to take it beyond that. The idea is and was transcendence, that most difficult of ideas that incorporates acceptance, forgiveness, looking beyond the mundane.
This is not an easy concept, the fundamentalists fear it more than anything else, the atheists cannot acknowledge the spiritual aspect of their humanity, the established Church erect ritual barricades to combat it, and they miss all the fun.